Guitar Fingerboard Logic
Nov. 27th, 2008 12:06 pmI'm trying to learn the guitar in a way that's compatible with reading standard sheet music. But the notes on the guitar fingerboard seem at first fairly random-- because of the different number of steps between successive notes and between strings, it's tough to predict.
Here's a standard fingerboard diagram, from wikipedia:

But there's another way of looking at it, and every note makes sense:


Edits: corrected score octave, added mysteriously-disappearing notes.
Every note is either on a staff line or a staff-middle. This diagram is for a guitar in standard tuning (E-A-D-G-B-E), against a staff in C major. Changes in the tuning move a guitar string up or down; sharps and flats in the staff move its lines up and down.
The guitar strings aren't evenly spaced, because there are only four half steps between the G and B strings. The staff lines aren't evenly spaced, because there are different numbers of half steps between them. The one thing that is evenly spaced here is the one thing that's not on a guitar: the frets. That's because what's non-linear in space is linear in what we hear. All music is on a log scale, but so are our ears (like all our senses), so it cancels out.
I've called out the C's in purple for convenience. Also, I show the notes on the frets, instead of between them where you hold the string.
Note: this, along with all my posted material, is Creative Commons.
Here's a standard fingerboard diagram, from wikipedia:

But there's another way of looking at it, and every note makes sense:


Edits: corrected score octave, added mysteriously-disappearing notes.
Every note is either on a staff line or a staff-middle. This diagram is for a guitar in standard tuning (E-A-D-G-B-E), against a staff in C major. Changes in the tuning move a guitar string up or down; sharps and flats in the staff move its lines up and down.
The guitar strings aren't evenly spaced, because there are only four half steps between the G and B strings. The staff lines aren't evenly spaced, because there are different numbers of half steps between them. The one thing that is evenly spaced here is the one thing that's not on a guitar: the frets. That's because what's non-linear in space is linear in what we hear. All music is on a log scale, but so are our ears (like all our senses), so it cancels out.
I've called out the C's in purple for convenience. Also, I show the notes on the frets, instead of between them where you hold the string.
Note: this, along with all my posted material, is Creative Commons.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 03:19 pm (UTC)It really doesn't lend itself so easily to sheet music, as, say, a piano or a saxophone. What you have here looks immensely frustrating. If you really want to be able to play sheet music on guitar, I would start by memorizing every note on the guitar (it will take you a while, but you will start to see the patterns), and then learning to recognize what different chords look like on sheet music.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 04:04 pm (UTC)At this point, I don't actually want to play chords (strumming vs. picking)-- it's just not the kind of sound I want to make. I got a guitar because I wanted a better kind of harp. I've started learning chords, because it lets me how and where to hold my fingers for playing notes that often come together in sequence, but eventually I'd love to forget them.
Have you done much classic guitar? Any ideas on where to find this teaching style online?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 04:13 pm (UTC)I really don't have any experience with classic guitar, but I have found that youtube is great for learning all kinds of guitar techniques.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-28 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-28 12:12 am (UTC)C major
G major
G minor
D major
D minor
E minor
F major
A minor
And by "learn" I mean, practice the ability to say, "Now, I'm going to play the $key $mode scale at speed up and down my instrument" and successfully do so, on demand.
Then I would be able to look at a piece in any of those keys and say, "hey! I know where all those notes are!" and proceed to use them to try to play the piece.
However, IANAG.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-28 01:26 pm (UTC)There's an issue I've encountered playing scales, and you might have some thoughts on it. Playing scales on the guitar requires moving one's finger every note. Successive notes can be found either on the same string, or more-than-a-hand away on another string. But I think this is exactly the wrong thing to do when playing a song: you want to leave both that finger and that string alone, if possible, because reusing them immediately will break up the sound. So, I'm inclined to learn my scales mixed-up, like maybe going around the octave in thirds, C-E-G-B-D-F-A. Any reason I shouldn't?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-29 04:52 am (UTC)I suspect (IANAG) that punteado requires you to smoothly move a single finger from pitch to adjacent pitch, to next adjacent pitch, because your other fingers will be busy doing counterpoint. Certainly, that is what violinists do, which is pretty much the same concept, only without frets to make it easy. And part of the craft of playing the instrument is managing to do that smoothly.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-27 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-28 12:03 am (UTC)